Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Aequat. Math. 91 (2017), 1025–1040 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-017-0514-7
We correct an error in [1, Theorem 4.2(b)]. The correct statement of Theorem 4.2(b) is:
Let \(N\in \mathbb {N}{\setminus } \{1\}\) and \(\gamma \in K^*\). If \(f,g:K \rightarrow K\) are additive solutions of (2) with \(\phi (x)=\gamma x^N\), then there exist a derivation \(D:K \rightarrow K\) and a constant \(a\in K\) such that
The converse is also true.
In the original proof the mistake occurs at the bottom of p. 1030, where an N is missing from the last line of the calculation for f(t). It should read
This gives the form of f shown above (and the formula for g is already established).
For the converse we show that such f and g satisfy (2) with \(\phi (x) = \gamma x^N\) as follows.
for all \(x \in K\).
Reference
Ebanks, B.: Linked pairs of additive functions. Aequat. Math. 91(6), 1025–1040 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebanks, B. Correction to: Linked pairs of additive functions. Aequat. Math. 98, 1439–1440 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-024-01108-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-024-01108-7