Abstract
Two forms of energy justice provide insight on Australia’s petroleum and coal problematic policy issues. First, distributive justice is used to cover the implications of low revenues from critical energy minerals; and fair allocations of resource income. Unfortunately, calls for true reform by the Australian community has resulted in a weak response from government. Second, cosmopolitan justice is used to consider the global effects of Australia’s fossil fuel extraction and use. Petroleum and coal exports result in GHG being emitted beyond the borders of the source country. However, there is now pressure in Australia to limit the opening of coal mines that supply the export market, but no such limit is applied to gas exports.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Australia’s export volumes of liquified natural gas (LNG) are the largest globally. The coastal waters off Western Australia are the main source of gas resources, a petroleum commodity. Coal is Australia’s largest energy resource, with the states of Queensland and New South Wales (NSW) as the primary sites for metallurgical, black coal. Australia’s export volumes of metallurgical coal are the largest globally.Footnote 1 Both gas and coal have policy issues that energy justice could address which this chapter details below.
2 Background
2.1 Petroleum
A key policy problem with Australia’s petroleum resources (which are community owned) is the low federal tax revenues from its petroleum resource rent tax (PRRT), and the proposed 2023 Federal Budget changes to the PRRT will generate only modest additional revenue.Footnote 2 This issue is followed closely by policy concerns over the sector’s large greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Australia’s current LNG production capacity is 88 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). The latest statistics show that 82 mtpa were exported in 2022 with record industry revenues of AU$91 billion.Footnote 3 The federal government’s PRRT collection in 2021–2022, however, was only AU$1.6 billion.Footnote 4 A negative aspect of high production volumes is the annual, national proportion of GHG emissions from Australian fossil fuels—mainly from LNG production—of 9.8%, or 47.9 mt CO2-e.Footnote 5
2.2 Coal
The key policy problem from Australia’s coal resources concerns its GHG emissions, arising from its being the main energy source for domestic electricity generation. There are also emissions from coal exported outside of Australia. Taxation is often used to change behaviourFootnote 6; for instance, to increase prices to make a commodity less desirable. Coal, however, is not taxed centrally by the federal government, rather the states of Australia have their own policies and systems of royalties levied on coal.
Australia’s metallurgical coal production in 2021–2022 was 174 mt. Thermal coal production in 2021–2022 was 237 mtFootnote 7; and primarily used for electricity generation in the states of NSW, Victoria and Queensland. In 2020, NSW coal royalty collections were AU$1.6 billion, while for Queensland it was AU$4.5 billion.Footnote 8 The annual, national proportion of GHG emissions from the Australian coal-fired electricity sector was an alarming 32%, or 157 mt CO2-e.Footnote 9
3 The Power of Energy Justice to Transform These Policy Issues
Energy justice can facilitate discussions about energy sector GHG emissions, as well as effective taxation of energy resources. Energy justice is a normative theory that sets out sustainable pathways for the energy sector.Footnote 10 The theory can be seen as five forms of justice: procedural justice, recognition justice, cosmopolitan justice, restorative justice and distributive justice.Footnote 11
This chapter selects two forms of energy justice to address the petroleum and coal issues at hand. First, distributive justice concerns the revenues from the critical energy minerals and how they are allocated. Taxation is a tool to elicit a return from the exploitation of resources for public goods, and how tax revenues are shared is a vital question. For example, Australia’s Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, lost the chance to substantially increase PRRT revenues from petroleum profits contained in the recent 2023 Federal Budget.Footnote 12 Unfortunately, calls for true reform by the community has resulted in a weak response from government.Footnote 13 The states’ collections from coal royalties are also the subject of robust debate. For instance, a recent report notes ‘a 7-year coal royalty deferral arrangement between a company and the Queensland government’.Footnote 14
Second, cosmopolitan justice stems from the belief that we are all citizens of the world and must consider the global effects of our actions. Typically, a source country exports fossil fuels that results in the importing country burning those resources for energy. The negative result is GHG being emitted beyond the borders of the source country.
An example of the cosmopolitan justice “beyond borders” concern was seen in a court decision on the Rocky Hill coal mine in 2019 in Australia, where it was held, in part, that the coal mine would be denied permission to open.Footnote 15 The court decision addressed the effects of the carbon dioxide that would be produced in other places in the world once that coal was transported and burnt outside of Australia. Thus, there is now pressure in Australia to limit the opening of coal mines that supply the export market.
Further, in April 2023 a commercial decision took effect to close the 50-year-old Liddell coal-fired power station in the state of NSW. It was based on the age, inefficiency and unreliability of the plant.Footnote 16 Given Liddell has contributed to 32% of national emissions from electricity generation—surely the other reason for the plant’s closure had to be: excessive emissions of GHG. This is a case where cosmopolitan justice could be applied.
The implementation of energy justice can be furthered by thinking about the need for a new social contract between the energy sector and society in Australia. A civil society requires that all members respect the rights of others even if it means reducing individual expectations.
4 Conclusion—Achieving Energy Justice in Australian Tax Policy
The record AU$91 billion in revenues in 2021–2022 from Australian LNG exports, and associated infrastructure spending make short-term energy transformation difficult.Footnote 17 This is why climate change forums, such as the United Nations COPs,Footnote 18 are so important as there needs to be global efforts to shift away from fossil fuels. The federal government could apply PRRT collections from petroleum to fund transition strategies. The tax take, however, must be adequate in the first instance. As for coal in Australia, there are still political divisions on the continued use of coal as a source of energy. Coal industry lobbying strength and jobs in the industry are unfortunately fragmenting state governments’ policy decisions to reduce reliance on coal.
Government policy is a key element to progress a shift away from fossil fuel energy, whether coal or gas, to renewable energy. Self-regulation of emissions by industry has not worked. One recent federal policy development in 2023 is the Safeguard Mechanism,Footnote 19 that requires Australia’s largest GHG emitters to keep their net emissions below certain limits.
This chapter has considered petroleum and coal policy issues around taxation take and GHG emissions, both in Australia and beyond its borders. The energy justice lens of distribution justice, and cosmopolitan justice, have facilitated a clearer picture of the policy path forward.
There needs to be a fairer tax system to equitably share the benefits of energy minerals extraction, with the government share best distributed to address the negatives of GHG emissions. Bearing in mind the cosmopolitanism of our existence, taxes from developed countries should fund loss and damage from climate change borne by developing countries. Ultimately, there needs to be a just transition to a low-carbon economy.
Notes
- 1.
Gas and Coal data from Department of Industy Science and Resources, “Resources and Energy Quarterly: March 2023”, (Canberra: Australian Government, 2023), 50, 54, 76.
- 2.
The Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987 (Cth) applies a tax on profits from petroleum extraction projects operating in Australian waters. Low tax revenues are addressed by Kraal D, M Mulder, and P Perey, “Taxation and Pricing of Natural Gas: The Dutch transition to gas market hub pricing and lessons for Australia’s integrated gas projects” (2020) 43(1) University of New South Wales Law Journal 39–81. Treasurer Jim Chalmers, Media Release, 7 May 2023, “Changes to the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax.” <https://ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/jim-chalmers-2022/media-releases/changes-petroleum-resource-rent-tax>.
- 3.
Department of Industy Science and Resources, “Resources and Energy Quarterly: March 2023”, above n 1, 75.
- 4.
Australian Treasury, Budget Paper No. 1. Budget Strategy and Outlook: October 2022–23, Canberra, <https://budget.gov.au/2022-23-october/content/bp1/download/bp1_bs-5.pdf>.
- 5.
Department of Climate Change Energy the Environment and Water, Quarterly update of Australia’s national greenhouse gas inventory for September 2022, Australian Government, Canberra, <https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/nggi-quarterly-update-sept-2022.pdf>, p. 9.
- 6.
For example, Rogers P, R de Silva, and R Bhatia, “Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability” (2002) 4(1) Water Policy 1–17.
- 7.
Department of Industy Science and Resources, “Resources and Energy Quarterly: March 2023,” above n 1, 59, 74.
- 8.
Foote C, A Fair Share? Royalties in Australia, Michael West Media, Perth, <https://www.michaelwest.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/A-Fair-Share_-Royalties-Report.pdf>, 32.
- 9.
Department of Climate Change Energy the Environment and Water, ‘Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory for September 2022’, above n 5, 9.
- 10.
Kraal D and R Heffron, “Resource Rent Tax: Its principles, application and need for change in Australia” (2022) 37(4) Australian Tax Forum 559–599, 593.
- 11.
Heffron RJ, Achieving a just transition to a low-carbon economy (Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, 2021), 16.
- 12.
Toscano N and M Foley, ‘Gas giants face tax rise threat as Chalmers flags resource rent reform’, Sydney Morning Herald, 18 April 2023 <https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/gas-giants-face-tax-rise-threat-as-chalmers-flags-resource-rent-reform-20230417-p5d12n.html>. See PRRT report: Australian Treasury. “Review of the PRRT Gas Transfer Pricing Arrangements. Final Report to the Treasurer, 7 May 2023.” Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. <https://treasury.gov.au/publication/p2023-388153>.
- 13.
Eg. Wood D, K Griffiths, and I Chan, Back in black? A menu of measures to repair the budget (Grattan Institute, 2023), 42–43. <https://grattan.edu.au/report/back-in-black-a-menu-of-measures-to-repair-the-budget/>. Kraal D, ‘The Importance of Energy Justice for Oil and Gas Taxation’, Austaxpolicy, 6 April 2023 <https://www.austaxpolicy.com/the-importance-of-energy-justice-for-oil-and-gas-taxation/>.
- 14.
Foote, ‘A Fair Share? Royalties in Australia’, above n 8, 3.
- 15.
Gloucester Resources (“Rocky Hill”) case. Decision rejecting the coal mine: Gloucester Resources Limited v Minister for Planning [2019] NSWLEC 7 <http://envlaw.com.au/gloucester-resources-case/>.
- 16.
Gilmore J and T Nelson, ‘Farewell Liddell: What to expect when Australia’s oldest coal plant closes’, The Conversation 13 April 2023 <https://theconversation.com/farewell-liddell-what-to-expect-when-australias-oldest-coal-plant-closes-203548>.
- 17.
The LNG industry has spent AU$200 billion on infrastructure in Australia since the year 2000, see Kraal D, “Review of the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax: Implications from a case study of the Gorgon gas project” (2017) 45(2) Federal Law Review 315–349, 316.
- 18.
The 2023 United Nations COP is in Dubai, <https://www.expocitydubai.com/en/expo-city-dubai-cop28>.
- 19.
Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2023. It amends the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (Cth).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kraal, D. (2024). Australian Petroleum and Coal Resources: Taxation, Emissions and Energy Justice. In: Heffron, R.J., de Fontenelle, L. (eds) The Power of Energy Justice & the Social Contract. Just Transitions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46282-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46282-5_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46281-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46282-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)