Abstract
According to the actual situation of the Engineering, the structure safety evaluation is carried out, and the bearing capacity of the main structure is checked according to the corresponding test results and specifications. On this basis, a comprehensive evaluation of the structural safety of a “一” type building in a hospital is carried out, which provides a basis for the subsequent structural transformation and reinforcement, and provides a reference for similar Engineering.
Si Wu and Lin Ding contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Keywords
1 Engineering Situation
The building is located in Fucheng District, Mianyang City, Sichuan Province. It was built in 1996. The building has 7 floors and the height of the house is 24.90 m. The height of the first and seventh floors is 4.2 m, and the height of the rest floors is 3.3 m. The building area is about 3500 m2.
2 On Site Inspection and Testing Analysis
In order to have a comprehensive understanding of the structural safety performance of the inspected structure, the original data of the inspected structure is first verified before testing, and then on-site testing is carried out on the structure based on the actual situation [1].
2.1 An Analysis of Engineering Structure Documents
Before on-site testing, investigated the usage history of engineering structures and relevant design and construction history data of the inspected structures [2]. The seismic fortification intensity of the building during design was 6°; the foundation is pile foundation, with pebble layer as the holding layer, and the characteristic value of bearing capacity of roadbed should not be less than 700 kPa; the main structure adopts C20 grade concrete. The longitudinal reinforcement of beams and columns adopts HRB335 grade reinforcement. The stirrup adopts HPB300 grade rebar. Prefabricated hollow slabs are used for floor and roof panels.
2.2 Check the Building Foundation
The construction site is flat, no adverse geological phenomena such as landslides, collapses, subsidence, or ground fissures were observed on site. On site inspection did not find any obvious settlement or adverse phenomena such as foundation cracks or local damage caused by settlement in the main structure foundation, there is no lateral displacement or crack caused by uneven settlement in its upper structure.
2.3 Detection of Structural Component
Component Section Dimension Inspection
Part of the concrete column components and concrete beam components were selected on site for Component section dimension inspection [3]. The detection values are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Component Reinforcement, Concrete Strength and Carbonation Depth Testing
On site, a steel bar detector was used to detect the quantity of steel bars in concrete components, and the test results showed that the steel bar configuration met the requirements for construction quality acceptance.
Since the building commissioner was in use and the site did not have the conditions for core drilling and sampling, the compressive strength of the concrete members of the main structure of the first floor of the project was tested by the rebound method [4].
In accordance with the “Technical standard for in-site inspection of concrete structure”(GB/T50784-2013), When the standard deviation of the inspection lot is unknown, the upper and lower limits of the presumptive interval of the eigenvalue (0.05 quantile) xk of the metrologically sampled inspection lot with 95% guarantee can be calculated according to the following formula:
where xk1 is the upper limit of the eigenvalue (0.05 quantile), xk2 is the lower limit of the eigenvalue (0.05 quantile), m is the arithmetic mean of the sample, s is the standard deviation of the sample, k1 and k2 are the coefficients of the upper and lower limits of the presumptive interval, the values taken are shown in the values corresponding to the sample capacity in the 0.05 quartile value column in GB/T50784-2013 “Technical standard for in-site inspection of concrete structure” [5]. The evaluation results are shown in Table 3.
Measurements of the carbonation depth of the reinforced concrete members were taken on site and the measurements showed that: The carbonation depth values ranged from 13.52 to 46.35 mm, and the combination of the appearance quality of the members and the detection of the protective layer thickness of the steel reinforcement shows that the carbonation depth of some reinforced concrete members was close to or exceeded the protective layer thickness of the steel reinforcement. [6].
3 The Security Analysis of the Struct
3.1 The Security Analysis of the Main Structural Components
Based on on-site measurement data and calculation results, some main components R/ γ0S ≥ 1.00, the concrete structural components of this part are evaluated as au level based on their bearing capacity level; Part of the main components R/ γ0S ≥ 0.95, the concrete structural components of this part are evaluated as bu level based on their bearing capacity level; Part of the main components R/ γ0S < 0.90, the concrete structural components of this part are evaluated as du level based on their bearing capacity level; on site inspection found that the construction of the concrete structural components of the building is reasonable, the connection method is correct, and there are no defects on the surface. Based on the construction situation, the safety level of the upper concrete structural components is evaluated as bu level; There is no obvious lateral bending or horizontal displacement observed in the concrete components, and the safety of the concrete components is evaluated as bu level based on the displacement or deformation that is not suitable for bearing; Some of the concrete members had force cracks of up to 0.5 mm, and the safety of the concrete structural components is evaluated as cu level based on the cracks.
3.2 Safety Assessment of Buildings
Based on the rating results of its foundation, upper load-bearing structure, and load-bearing sub units of the enclosure system, as well as other safety issues related to the entire building, the safety level of the building is rated as Csu level [7].
4 Anti-Overturning Checking
Based on the analysis of the safety testing results of the project structure, the anti overturning calculation is carried out [8]. During the verification calculation, referring to the original design drawings and based on the actual structural layout and dimensions, the SATWE2021 (V1.3.1 version) from China Academy of Building Sciences Beijing Gouli Technology Co., Ltd. is used for modeling and calculation.
Building width B = 49.8 m; Building height H = 27.9 m; Building length L = 20 m; If the aspect ratio of the building is H/B = 2.325 < 4, the stress zone on the foundation bottom of this project should not exceed 15% of the area of the foundation bottom [8]. The foundation burial depth of this project is set at 2 m.
According to the calculation results of SATWE2021 (V1.3.1 version), the total mass generated by dead load:g = 4580.099KN; The total mass generated by live load:q = 325.352KN.
Bottom shear force and bending moment under wind load: Vx1 = 222.5KN; Vy1 = 824.0KN;Mx1 = 3721.5KN·m; My1 = 13275.6KN·m. The shear force diagram is shown in Fig. 1 and the bending moment diagram is shown in Fig. 2.
Bottom shear force and bending moment under earthquake action: Vx1 = 840.8KN; Vy1 = 714.5KN;Mx1 = 13546.27KN·m; My1 = 11432.31KN·m.
Taking the burial depth of the building: C = 2 m, The overturning moment of the building Mov = VC + M, The calculation point of anti overturning moment is assumed to be the outer edge point of the foundation, and the calculation force of anti overturning moment is the representative value of the total gravity load, Then the anti overturning moment:Mr = GB/2,G = g + 0.5q = 4742.775KN. The calculation results are shown in Table 4.
From the above table, it can be seen that Mr. is greater than 3Mov, which meets the specification requirements, so there is no stress zone in the base [9].
5 Conclusions and Recommendations
-
(1)
Although the compressive strength of reinforced concrete members of the building meets the requirements, the carbonization depth of the members is large, and the protective layer of reinforcement of some members is too thin, which has a greater impact on the safety and durability of the structure, and it is necessary to take corresponding repair, reinforcement and maintenance measures to ensure that the subsequent use of the building requirements [10].
-
(2)
Under the existing structural system and existing loading conditions, the overall structural safety of the building is rated at Csu level, and there are major problems with the structural safety performance, which significantly affects the overall load bearing, and treatment measures should be taken to enable it to meet the due safety requirements.
-
(3)
Where the shear bearing capacity of the beam is insufficient, it is recommended to take the beam side paste steel plate or paste carbon fiber reinforcement. Where the bending capacity of beam is insufficient, it is recommended to take the bottom of the beam to paste steel plate or increase the cross-section reinforcement. For the column bending bearing capacity is insufficient, it is recommended to take the column outside the package angle or increase the cross-section reinforcement.
References
Zhang, Z., Xiong, C.: Structural safety inspection and appraisal analysis of an aged wharf and factory workshop. Build. Struct. (2012). https://doi.org/10.19701/j.jzjg.2012.s2.103
Li, J., Zhang, Z.: Safety appraisal and analysis of the space grid roof of an industrial plant .Build. Struct. (2023). https://doi.org/10.19701/j.jzjg.23S1298
Technical standard for inspection of building structure (GB/T 50344-2019). China Architecture Publishing & Media Co., Ltd, Beijing (2019)
Technical standard for in-site inspection of concrete structure (GB/T50784-2013). China Architecture Publishing&Media Co., Ltd, Beijing (2013)
Zabelina, O.: Application of non-destructive methods of control within the inspection of concrete structures. EDP Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202125809007
Standard for appraisal of reliability of civil buildings (GB 50292-2015). China Architecture Publishing & Media Co., Ltd, Beijing (2015)
Shogo, T.: Non-destructive inspection of concrete structures using an electromagnetic wave radar. J-STAGE (2004). https://doi.org/10.11499/SICEP.2004.0_69_3
Vereecken, E., Botte, W., Lombaert, G., Caspeele, R.: Bayesian decision analysis for the optimization of inspection and repair of spatially degrading concrete structures. Elsevier (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111028
Code for design of building foundation (GB50007-2011). China Architecture Publishing & Media Co., Ltd, Beijing (2010)
General code for assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings (GB 55021-2021). China Architecture Publishing & Media Co., Ltd, Beijing (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, S., Ding, L. (2024). Safety Inspection and Appraisal Analysis of a “一” Type Building in a Hospital. In: Xiang, P., Zuo, L. (eds) Novel Technology and Whole-Process Management in Prefabricated Building. PBSFTT 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 382. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5108-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5108-2_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-5107-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-5108-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)