Skip to main content

Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior
  • 61 Accesses

Synonyms

Marriage; Questionnaire; Relationship; Satisfaction; Scale

Definition

It is a self-report questionnaire that measures the level of satisfaction with the marital relationship.

Introduction

Marital satisfaction is one of the most critical factors in a healthy family performance (Greef, 2000). Schoen et al. (2002) define marital satisfaction as a global assessment of one’s marriage and a reflection of marital happiness and functioning. Marital satisfaction is a conscious feeling of happiness and pleasure experienced by a spouse while considering all current aspects of his or her marriage (Chandrakanth, 2015). Marital satisfaction can be defined as a person’s mental state reflecting marriage’s perceived benefits and costs (Nadia & Shahid, 2012).

The Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale is a tool for assessing the quality of marital relationships. Psychologists Caryl Rusbult and John Morrow created the scale in the 1980s as part of their research into the factors that contribute to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chandrakanth, J. (2015). Marital coping style among working and non-working women. International Journal of Management and Social Science, 3(6), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H. (2004). Application and revision of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale for use with Korean couples. Psychological Reports, 95(3), 1015–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greef, A. P. (2000). Characteristics of families that function well. Journal of Family Issues, 21(8), 948–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. G., Woody, D., Maxwell, S., Mercer, R., & Williams, S. (1998). Reliability and validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction scale in a sample of African–American husbands and wives. Psychological Reports, 82(1), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1998.82.1.255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadia, A., & Shahid, I. (2012). The factors predicting marital satisfaction: A gender difference in Pakistan. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6(7), 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. M., Loy, J. T. C., MohdZain, Z., & Cheong, W. (2013). Gender, race, adult attachment, and marital satisfaction among Malaysians. The Family Journal, 21(2), 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, C. W., Schumm, W. R., Schectman, K. L., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, R., Singh, L. N., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2019). Factorial validation of hindi version of dyadic adjustment scale. IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reig-Ferrer, A., Cepeda-Benito, A., & Snyder, D. K. (2004). Utility of the Spanish translation of the marital satisfaction inventory–Revised in Spain. Assessment, 11(1), 17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rios, C. M. (2010). The relationship between premarital advice, expectations and marital satisfaction. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (2020). Quality marriage index. In Communication research measures (pp. 301–303). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Rothert, K., Standish, N. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2002). Womens employment, marital happiness and divorce. Social Forces, 81, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, W. R., Crock, R. J., Likcani, A., Akagi, C. G., & Bosch, K. R. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale with different response formats in a recent sample of US Army personnel. Individual Differences Research, 6(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D. T., Lam, M. C., Tsoi, K. W., & Lam, C. M. (1993). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 21(3), 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. K. (1997). Manual for the marital satisfaction inventory–revised Los Angeles. CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1989). Dyadic adjustment scale. Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. H. (1994). Follow-through in conflict resolution as a factor in marital satisfaction and personal happiness. University of Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Akanksha, D., Pusdekar, Y., Pusdekar, V., Deshmukh, V. (2023). Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS). In: Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_1294-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_1294-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08956-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08956-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics