Skip to main content

Democracy and Development in Mexico and Chile

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
  • 3 Accesses

Synonyms

Alternative development in Mexico and Chile; Civil society in Mexico and Chile; Equitable prosperity in Mexico and Chile; Neo-liberal development in Mexico and Chile; Rights-based development; Technocratic knowledge

Definition

In the late 1980s, two competing visions of democracy emerged in Mexico and Chile. One is concerned with political participation on the part of the poor and their advocates and has as its objective that of achieving improved social well-being. The other, which focuses on the formal processes of liberal democracy (such as elections), takes the position that elected leaders and their technocratic advisors are best able to formulate effective social policies. While the former perspective sees the local community and state as having an important development role (defined as improvement in the lives of the poor), the latter takes the position that the market must play the predominant role in development (defined as economic growth). These conflicting...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (China (P.R.))
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 4,279.99
Price includes VAT (China (P.R.))
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 3,999.99
Price excludes VAT (China (P.R.))
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, M. A. (1999). Democracy within reason. Technocratic revolution in Mexico (2nd ed.). University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe). (2019). Panorama Social de América Latina, Anexo. Santiago: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2005). Introduction. In L. Diamond & L. Morlino (Eds.), Assessing the quality of democracy (pp. ix–iviii). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). (2006). Social panorama of Latin America. New York: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Cambridge/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación Superación de la Pobreza. (2017). Piñera y Guillier recibieron 664 propuestas ciudadanas entregadas por la sociedad civil. http://www.superacionpobreza.cl/pinera-y-guillier-recibieron-664-propuestas-ciudadanas-entregadas-por-la-sociedad-civil/

  • Hernández Martíneza, J. A., Herrera Tapia, F., & Chávez Mejía, C. (2015). Capacidades, liderazgos y estrategias de gestión deorganizaciones de la sociedad civil en zonas rurales. Contaduría y Administración, 60, 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irarrázaval, I., Paz Sagredo, M., & Streeter, P. (2019). Un nuevo trato para las. Organizaciones de la sociedad civil. Desafíos y propuestas. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Centro de Políticas Públicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesner, J. L. (2001). Legacies of authoritarianism: Political attitudes in Chile and Mexico. In R. A. Camp (Ed.), Citizen views of democracy in Latin America (pp. 118–138). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, M., & Lazar, S. (2003). Doing the right thing. Rights-based development in Latin American NGOs. London: ITDG Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paley, J. (2001). Marketing democracy: Power and social movements in post-dictatorship Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, J. N. (2001). Development theory. Deconstructions/reconstructions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (2006). The politics of difference and Women’s rights: Lessons from pobladoras and mapuche women in Chile. Social Politics, International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 13, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. (2004). Addressing inequality. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and development. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahler-Sholk, R., Vanden, H. E., & Keuker, G. D. (2007). Introduction: Globalizing resistance, the politics of new social movements in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives, 34(2), 15–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckermann, L. (2018). AMLO y su desconfianza a la sociedad civil. Excélsior. 12 de Abril. https://www.excelsior.com.mx/opinion/leo-zuckermann/amlo-y-su-desconfianza-a-la-sociedad-civil/1232004

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Teichman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Teichman, J. (2023). Democracy and Development in Mexico and Chile. In: Maggino, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3889

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics