Skip to main content

Legal Positivism: Inclusive

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
  • 50 Accesses

Introduction

Jurisprudence is the philosophical study of law asking questions like: What constitutes a legally valid rule? Or, what constitutes a legal system? Or, what makes a good legal rule?

In the pursuit to explain the nature of law, to identify the existence conditions of law, general jurisprudence has at its disposal two mother theories: legal positivism and natural law theory. Natural law claims that we can make sense of legal rules as reasons for action, i.e., reasons for doing what the rule demands, ifsuch rules are derived from reason and concurrent with principles of justice and rule of law. As such, morality is an existence condition of law. Legal positivism holds that the existence of law is a matter of social fact. This entry will unpack what that means and the claims specific to Inclusive Legal Positivism [ILP], a conception of law that grounds itself in positivist claims about the nature of law while accounting for the core intuition of natural law theory that...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aquinas T (ST I-II.Q95.A2) Summa Theologica, various editions

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin J (2007) The province of jurisprudence determined. In: Culver K (ed) Readings in the philosophy if law, 2nd edn. Broadview Press, Guelph, pp 81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates v. Cincinnati (1971) United States Supreme Court 402:611

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J (1998) Incorporationism, conventionality, and the practical difference thesis. Leg Theory 4(4):381–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J (1980) Natural law and natural rights. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J (Winter, 2015) Natural law theories. In: Zalta N (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-theories/. Accessed 14 July 2016

  • Hart HLA (1958) Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harv Law Rev 71:593. [Reprinted in his (1983) Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1994) The concept of law, Bulloch P, Raz J (eds), 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1975) Practical reasons and norms. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1979) The authority of law. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Regina v. Morgentaler (1985) Supreme Court of Canada Reports 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S (1998) On Hart’s way out. Leg Theory 4:469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waluchow WJ (1994) Inclusive legal positivism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Waluchow WJ (2000) Authority and the practical difference thesis: a defense of inclusive legal positivism. Leg Theory 6:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Additional Readings

  • Coleman J (2001) The practice of principle. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson J (2001) Evaluation and legal theory. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardener J (2001) Legal positivism: 5½ myths. Am J Jurisprud 46:199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1983) Essays on jurisprudence and philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Himma K (2000) H.L.A. Hart and the practical difference thesis. Leg Theory 6:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer M (2000) How moral principles can enter into the law. Leg Theory 6:83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer M (2004) Where law and morality meet. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer M (2008) The legacy of H.L.A. Hart: legal, political, and moral philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mindus P, Spaak T (eds) (2021) The Cambridge companion to legal positivism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1980) The concept of a legal system, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S (1998) The difference that rules make. In: Bix B (ed) Analyzing law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Waluchow WJ (1985) Herculean positivism. Oxf J Leg Stud 5:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waluchow WJ (1989) The weak social thesis. Oxf J Leg Stud 9:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waluchow WJ (1990) Charter challenges: a test case for theories of law. Osgoode Hall Law J 29:183

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kara Woodbury-Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Woodbury-Smith, K. (2023). Legal Positivism: Inclusive. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-3

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Legal Positivism: Inclusive
    Published:
    24 November 2022

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-3

  2. Original

    Inclusive Legal Positivism
    Published:
    25 June 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-2