Introduction
Jurisprudence is the philosophical study of law asking questions like: What constitutes a legally valid rule? Or, what constitutes a legal system? Or, what makes a good legal rule?
In the pursuit to explain the nature of law, to identify the existence conditions of law, general jurisprudence has at its disposal two mother theories: legal positivism and natural law theory. Natural law claims that we can make sense of legal rules as reasons for action, i.e., reasons for doing what the rule demands, ifsuch rules are derived from reason and concurrent with principles of justice and rule of law. As such, morality is an existence condition of law. Legal positivism holds that the existence of law is a matter of social fact. This entry will unpack what that means and the claims specific to Inclusive Legal Positivism [ILP], a conception of law that grounds itself in positivist claims about the nature of law while accounting for the core intuition of natural law theory that...
References
Aquinas T (ST I-II.Q95.A2) Summa Theologica, various editions
Austin J (2007) The province of jurisprudence determined. In: Culver K (ed) Readings in the philosophy if law, 2nd edn. Broadview Press, Guelph, pp 81–96
Coates v. Cincinnati (1971) United States Supreme Court 402:611
Coleman J (1998) Incorporationism, conventionality, and the practical difference thesis. Leg Theory 4(4):381–425
Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Finnis J (1980) Natural law and natural rights. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Finnis J (Winter, 2015) Natural law theories. In: Zalta N (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-theories/. Accessed 14 July 2016
Hart HLA (1958) Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harv Law Rev 71:593. [Reprinted in his (1983) Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford]
Hart HLA (1994) The concept of law, Bulloch P, Raz J (eds), 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Raz J (1975) Practical reasons and norms. Hutchinson, London
Raz J (1979) The authority of law. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Regina v. Morgentaler (1985) Supreme Court of Canada Reports 30
Shapiro S (1998) On Hart’s way out. Leg Theory 4:469
Waluchow WJ (1994) Inclusive legal positivism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Waluchow WJ (2000) Authority and the practical difference thesis: a defense of inclusive legal positivism. Leg Theory 6:45
Additional Readings
Coleman J (2001) The practice of principle. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dickson J (2001) Evaluation and legal theory. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Gardener J (2001) Legal positivism: 5½ myths. Am J Jurisprud 46:199
Hart HLA (1983) Essays on jurisprudence and philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Himma K (2000) H.L.A. Hart and the practical difference thesis. Leg Theory 6:1
Kramer M (2000) How moral principles can enter into the law. Leg Theory 6:83
Kramer M (2004) Where law and morality meet. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kramer M (2008) The legacy of H.L.A. Hart: legal, political, and moral philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mindus P, Spaak T (eds) (2021) The Cambridge companion to legal positivism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Raz J (1980) The concept of a legal system, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Shapiro S (1998) The difference that rules make. In: Bix B (ed) Analyzing law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Waluchow WJ (1985) Herculean positivism. Oxf J Leg Stud 5:41
Waluchow WJ (1989) The weak social thesis. Oxf J Leg Stud 9:23
Waluchow WJ (1990) Charter challenges: a test case for theories of law. Osgoode Hall Law J 29:183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Woodbury-Smith, K. (2023). Legal Positivism: Inclusive. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Legal Positivism: Inclusive- Published:
- 24 November 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-3
-
Original
Inclusive Legal Positivism- Published:
- 25 June 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-2