Abstract
This chapter outlines the challenges and possibilities for working with underperformance in clinical education, based on theory and evidence. It commences by describing the experiences of underperformance from both learner and educator perspectives. Two comprehensive literature reviews on remediation from 2019 and 2021 are synthesized into ten strategies: five at program level and five at educator level. Drawing from self-determination theory, the guiding principles of building learners’ autonomy, competence, and relatedness are suggested as a useful frame for understanding how to frame any response to underperformance. Finally, feedback for future learning through building evaluative judgment is explored as a potential avenue for learners to build their capabilities beyond the area of immediate deficit. This chapter recognizes the complexity of working with underperformance, acknowledging there may be no easy solutions for this inherently challenging situation but offering a variety of different means to approach this educational problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajjawi R, Kent F, Broadbent J, Tai JH-M, Bearman M, Boud D. Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks. Stud High Educ. 2021:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115.
Bearman M, Molloy E, Ajjawi R, Keating J. ‘Is there a Plan B?’: clinical educators supporting underperforming students in practice settings. Teach High Educ. 2013;18(5):531–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752732.
Bearman M, Castanelli D, Denniston C. Identifying and working with underperformance. In: Learning and teaching in clinical contexts: a practical guide; 2018. p. 236–50.
Bearman M, Brown J, Kirby C, Ajjawi R. Feedback that helps trainees learn to practice without supervision. Acad Med. 2021;96(2):205–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003716.
Bellini LM, Kalet A, Englander R. Providing compassionate off-ramps for medical students is a moral imperative. Acad Med. 2019;94(5):656–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002568.
Bynum WE IV, Varpio L, Lagoo J, Teunissen PW. ‘I’m unworthy of being in this space’: the origins of shame in medical students. Med Educ. 2021;55(2):185–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14354.
Chou CL, Kalet A, Costa MJ, Cleland J, Winston K. Guidelines: the dos, don’ts and don’t knows of remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(6):322–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00544-5.
Cleland J, Knight LV, Rees CE, Tracey S, Bond CM. Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students. Med Educ. 2008;42(8):800–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03113.x.
Cleland J, Leggett H, Sandars J, Costa MJ, Patel R, Moffat M. The remediation challenge: theoretical and methodological insights from a systematic review. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):242–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12052.
Davenport R, Hewat S, Ferguson A, McAllister S, Lincoln M. Struggle and failure on clinical placement: a critical narrative review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(2):218–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12356.
Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: reconsidered once again. Rev Educ Res. 2001;71(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001.
Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 2005;80(10):S84–7.
Ellaway RH, Chou CL, Kalet AL. Situating remediation: accommodating success and failure in medical education systems. Acad Med. 2018;93(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001855
Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. J Am Med Assoc. 1983;250(6):777–81.
Fawns T, O’Shea C. Evaluative judgement of working practices. Ital J Educ Technol. 2019;27(1):5–18.
Handwerker SM. Challenges experienced by nursing students overcoming one course failure: a phenomenological research study. Teach Learn Nurs. 2018;13(3):168–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.007.
Kalet A, Chou CL, Ellaway RH. To fail is human: remediating remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(6):418–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0385-6.
LaDonna KA, Ginsburg S, Watling C. Shifting and sharing: academic physicians’ strategies for navigating underperformance and failure. Acad Med. 2018;93(11):1713–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002292.
Luhanga F, Yonge O, Myrick F. Precepting an unsafe student: the role of the faculty. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(2):227–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2007.04.001.
McGregor A. Academic success, clinical failure: struggling practices of a failing student. J Nurs Educ. 2007;46(11):504–11.
Molloy E, Ajjawi R, Bearman M, Noble C, Rudland J, Ryan A. Challenging feedback myths: values, learner involvement and promoting effects beyond the immediate task. Med Educ. 2020;54(1):33–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13802.
Price T, Wong G, Withers L, Wanner A, Cleland J, Gale T, et al. Optimising the delivery of remediation programmes for doctors: a realist review. Med Educ. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14528.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020;61:101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
Steinert Y. The “problem” learner: whose problem is it? AMEE Guide No. 76. Med Teach. 2013;35(4):e1035–45. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.774082.
Tai J, Canny BJ, Haines TP, Molloy EK. The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016;21(3):659–76.
Tai J, Ajjawi R, Boud D, Dawson P, Panadero E. Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. High Educ. 2018;76(3):467–81.
Woolf K. Differential attainment in medical education and training. BMJ. 2020;368:m339.
Yepes-Rios M, Dudek N, Duboyce R, Curtis J, Allard RJ, Varpio L. The failure to fail underperforming trainees in health professions education: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 42. Med Teach. 2016;38(11):1092–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215414.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bearman, M. (2023). Underperformance in Clinical Education: Challenges and Possibilities. In: Nestel, D., Reedy, G., McKenna, L., Gough, S. (eds) Clinical Education for the Health Professions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3344-0_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3344-0_55
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3343-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3344-0
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education