Abstract
The circular economy, a strategy for minimizing waste and maximizing the value of resources, has the potential to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It is a comprehensive strategy that encompasses several fields, including water and sanitation, agriculture, energy, and climate change. The sustainability of the global value chain based on trade, economic variables, corporate responsibility, labor, health, and human rights must be taken into account in a circular process. The robustness of the circle is enhanced by the confidence that metrology and conformity assessment provide on certain elements like safety, efficiency, repairability, durability, upgradability, and reusability. This chapter thoroughly analyzes how metrology and conformity assessment fit into the circular economy. The study’s objective is to further this debate by offering fresh perspectives on the development and current status of the field of circular economy research in general and its sustainability implications in particular. In order to provide assurance and recognition in domestic and international markets, it is crucial that quality infrastructure, such as metrology, accreditation, standardization, and conformity assessment, be integrated into the process of moving toward a circular economy, along with the government bodies that develop pertinent policies and strategies.
Access provided by Shenyang Normal University. Download reference work entry PDF
Keywords
Introduction
A classical model of production and consumption is known as a circular economy, which encompasses sharing, hiring, recycling, revamping, restoring, and reusing prevailing resources, products, and goods, as long as possible, to extend the life cycle of the resources/materials/products/goods. In reality, it suggests minimizing/reducing the concept of the circular economy which has historical roots dating back several decades. The principles and practices associated with circularity have been implemented throughout history in various forms (Korhonen et al. 2018; Bocken et al. 2016; Jonker et al. 2017). The term “circular economy” gained traction in the late twentieth century, with the publication of books such as “The Blue Economy” by Gunter Pauli (2010) and “Cradle to Cradle” by William McDonough and Michael Braungart (2009). These works highlighted the need to transition from linear to circular systems, emphasizing the value of materials, energy, and waste as potential resources. In the 1960s and 1970s, concepts like “cradle-to-cradle” and “industrial ecology” emerged, emphasizing the importance of designing products and systems with a focus on resource efficiency and minimizing waste. Historically, human societies relied on circular systems, where resources were used, reused, repaired, and repurposed to minimize waste and maximize efficiency. Examples include ancient civilizations’ practices of recycling materials, and repairing and reusing tools and goods, and traditional agricultural systems that incorporated nutrient recycling (Goyal et al. 2018; Corvellec et al. 2022; Kirchherr et al. 2017).
More recently, the linear “take-make-dispose” model has become dominant with the rise of industrialization and mass production (Elisha 2020). However, concerns over resource depletion, environmental degradation, and waste accumulation have led to renewed interest in circularity. These ideas have set the stage for the modern circular economy framework. Now, the circular economy has gained momentum globally. Governments, businesses, and civil society organizations have recognized the need for a more sustainable economic model and have implemented policies and initiatives to promote circular practices. Efforts have been made to integrate circularity into waste management, product design, supply chains, and resource management. The historical aspects of the circular economy demonstrate that the principles of resource efficiency, waste reduction, and recycling have been inherent to human societies throughout time. The modern circular economy movement builds upon these historical practices and integrates them with contemporary knowledge, technology, and global collaboration to create a sustainable and regenerative economic system (Stahel 2016; MacArthur 2013; Geng et al. 2019).
The circular economy aims to create a closed-loop system where materials and products are kept in circulation for as long as possible. It is an innovative economic model that aims to minimize waste generation and maximize resource efficiency. It emphasizes the importance of closing the loop by reintroducing materials and products back into the system, thus reducing the reliance on virgin resources. As the circular economy gains momentum, it becomes imperative to ensure that businesses and organizations adhere to sustainable practices. This is where conformity assessment plays a crucial role by providing a framework for verifying compliance and promoting transparency within the circular economy. Achieving the goals of the circular economy requires accurate and reliable measurements to assess resource efficiency, waste generation, and the environmental impact of circular practices. Metrological traceability, which refers to the documented chain of measurement standards and processes, plays a critical role in ensuring the integrity and comparability of measurements in the circular economy.
Conformity assessment refers to the process of evaluating whether a product, service, or system meets specified requirements, such as regulations, standards, or customer expectations. In the context of the circular economy, conformity assessment acts as a mechanism to assess and validate sustainable practices throughout a product’s life cycle, from its design and production to its use and disposal (Javaid et al. 2022; Liepiņa et al. 2014; Delaney 2008; Migliore et al. 2020). The conformity assessment offers several advantages that aid businesses of all sizes and in all industries in cutting costs, boosting productivity, breaking into new markets, and embracing the circular economy. Figure 1 shows the key benefits of conformity assessment in the circular economy. The significance of conformity assessment in the circular economy for Sustainable Growth is discussed in this chapter.
Key Elements of Conformity Assessment in the Circular Economy
Conformity assessment guarantees that particular requirements or expectations are being satisfied. In the context of the circular economy, it gives more weight and credibility to statements; those certain goods, services, systems, or procedures comply with predetermined standards, giving consumers more assurance regarding their ability to recycle, reuse, repair, upgrade, etc. Conformity assessment also scrutinizes claims made by businesses regarding their environmental performance, sustainability, and compliance with labor and social standards. This includes evaluating the accuracy of environmental labels, certifications, and product declarations. Conformity assessment emphasizes traceability and transparency to ensure responsible practices throughout the value chain. Conformity assessment may include evaluating the accuracy of environmental claims through third-party certifications and labels, such as Cradle to Cradle or Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). It also encourages the disclosure of product information, such as material composition, environmental impact assessments, and end-of-life options, to enable informed decision-making by consumers and stakeholders. Figure 2 illustrates the conformity assessments in circular economy that apply throughout the technical cycle.
Design and Material Selection
Conformity assessment starts at the design stage, where products should be developed with circularity in mind. This includes choosing materials that are recyclable, biodegradable, or can be easily repaired and refurbished. Conformity assessment examines whether the selected materials align with the principles of circular economy, such as being nontoxic, recyclable, or compostable. It also considers factors like energy consumption during material extraction and the environmental impact of their production. By verifying the compliance of products with circular design principles, conformity assessment promotes sustainable material selection and drives innovation in product design. Conformity assessment may involve conducting life cycle assessments (LCAs) to quantify the environmental footprint of products, assessing the availability and accessibility of recycled or renewable materials, and encouraging the use of eco-design principles. It also examines the potential for incorporating recycled content into products, ensuring that they meet specific standards and guidelines for circular design (Wastling et al. 2018; Ramakrishna and Jose 2022; Mestre and Cooper 2017; Van den Berg and Bakker 2015).
Manufacturing Processes
Conformity assessment necessitates that the manufacturing processes are environmentally responsible and aligned with circular economy goals. During the production phase, conformity assessment requires whether manufacturers employ environment-friendly processes, such as energy-efficient manufacturing, waste reduction, and the use of recycled or renewable materials. It examines energy efficiency, waste reduction strategies, water conservation measures, the use of recycled or renewable resources, and emissions reduction (Kankar et al. 2022; Kristoffersen et al. 2020). It verifies that the manufacturers employ sustainable production techniques, such as lean manufacturing, closed-loop systems, and eco-friendly technologies. It also assesses the implementation and compliance of environmental management systems and adherence to relevant regulations and certifications, such as ISO 50001 for energy management or ISO 14001 for environmental management systems (Jovanović and Filipović 2016; Yin and Schmeidler 2009). By encouraging sustainable manufacturing practices, conformity assessment helps reduce the carbon footprint and resource consumption associated with production.
Product Use and Maintenance
Conformity assessment extends to the usage phase, where products are evaluated for their usability, durability, ease of repair, and ability to be upgraded or reused. This assessment ensures that products are designed to prolong their life span and facilitate maintenance and repair activities. It evaluates whether products are designed to withstand regular use and if they can be easily maintained. Conformity assessment examines aspects like modularity, availability of spare parts, access to repair manuals and technical information, and the existence of repair networks or services. Ensuring that products are designed for longevity and ease of maintenance fosters a culture of reuse, repair, and circular consumption. It may involve evaluating product labeling to provide clear instructions for maintenance and responsible use, as well as promoting consumer education and awareness regarding sustainable consumption practices (Beges et al. 2010; Wastling et al. 2018).
Recycling and Waste Management
Effective recycling and waste management are integral to the circular economy, and conformity assessment plays a crucial role in this area. In the circular economy, effective recycling and waste management are crucial. Conformity assessment evaluates the systems and processes in place to ensure that waste is properly sorted, recycled, and reintroduced into the value chain. It verifies compliance with recycling standards, promotes the use of recycled materials, and encourages the implementation of efficient waste management practices. It assesses the recycling infrastructure, processes, and technologies in place to ensure efficient material recovery and reintroduction into the value chain. Conformity assessment verifies compliance with recycling standards, evaluates the quality of recycled materials, and promotes the use of recycled content in new products. It also examines waste management practices, including proper sorting, separation, and disposal of nonrecyclable or hazardous waste. By promoting robust recycling and waste management systems, conformity assessment enables the circular economy to achieve its goals of resource conservation and waste reduction. Conformity assessment for recycling and waste management focuses on verifying the effectiveness and efficiency of recycling systems. It includes evaluating the collection, sorting, and processing methods employed to maximize the recovery of valuable materials. Conformity assessment may assess the compatibility of products with existing recycling infrastructure, ensuring they can be properly recycled at the end of their lives. It also promotes the implementation of circular waste management practices, such as composting organic waste or utilizing waste-to-energy technologies. Conformity assessment in this area may involve compliance with recycling standards, certifications like the EU Ecolabel, or adherence to circular economy principles, such as the waste hierarchy (reduce, reuse, and recycle) (Atiemo et al. 2016; Nelles et al. 2016; Diaz 2017).
Metrological Traceability
Metrology is involved as a science, a function, and a sector itself in all aspects of product life cycles. It assists with product traceability and therefore directly contributes to reuse, repair, remanufacture, and repurpose principles. Metrological traceability plays a crucial role in the circular economy by ensuring accuracy, reliability, and comparability in measurements and data related to sustainable practices (Rab and Yadav 2022; Rab et al. 2020, 2023). As the circular economy strives to minimize waste and maximize resource efficiency, it is essential to have traceable and standardized measurements that provide confidence in the quantification of environmental impact, resource consumption, and recycling rates. This section explores the concept of metrological traceability in the circular economy, its significance, and its practical implications (Vogl 2021; Pendrill 2005).
Metrological traceability involves establishing a clear and documented chain of measurement, starting from a recognized measurement standard and extending to the measurement results obtained in a particular context. Figure 3 shows the graphical representation of the traceability chain. It shows how standards (SI – Primary – Secondary – Reference –Working) are connected. If in any of the stages, the standard is not traced to a higher standard, the traceability chain is broken. This is because it can no longer be traced back to the top chain. It ensures that measurements are linked to internationally recognized standards through an unbroken chain of comparisons, providing confidence in the accuracy and reliability of the results. In the context of the circular economy, metrological traceability allows for consistent and comparable measurements of key parameters, such as resource consumption, waste generation, and recycling rates. It ensures that entrepreneurs provide accurate and comprehensive information about the materials, components, and processes used in their products. This enables stakeholders and consumers to make informed decisions based on the environmental and social impact of the products they choose. It also ensures accountability and ethical practices within the circular economy. It evaluates the supply chain management systems to verify the origin and sourcing of materials, as well as the social and environmental conditions under which they were produced (Meškuotienė et al. 2022; Henson 2021; Rab and Brown 2023).
Significance and Importance of Metrological Traceability in the Circular Economy
Metrological traceability is extremely important and essential in the circular economy for the following reasons:
Reliable Measurement of Resource Efficiency
Metrological traceability enables accurate and standardized measurement of resource efficiency indicators, such as material input per unit of product or energy consumption per unit of output. Traceable measurements provide a common language for comparing the resource efficiency of different products, processes, and systems, facilitating informed decision-making.
Assessment of Environmental Impact
Traceability in measuring environmental impact parameters, such as greenhouse gas emissions, water usage, and waste generation, ensures consistency and comparability across different assessments. This enables a comprehensive evaluation of the environmental performance of circular economy practices and supports the development of evidence-based policies and strategies.
Monitoring of Recycling and Waste Management
Metrological traceability is crucial in assessing recycling rates, waste composition, and the effectiveness of waste management systems. Traceable measurements provide accurate data on the amounts and types of waste being recycled, ensuring transparency and accountability in circular economy initiatives.
Implementation of Metrological Traceability in the Circular Economy
As mentioned earlier, metrological traceability plays a critical role in promoting transparency, reliability, and efficiency in the circular economy. By providing accurate measurement data, facilitating standardization, and supporting process optimization, metrology contributes to the transition toward a more sustainable and resource-efficient economic model. For the establishment and implementation of metrological traceability in the circular economy, the following steps and key benefits are extremely useful:
Calibration and Standardization
Metrology ensures the precise and accurate measurement of physical quantities, allowing for the quantification of resources, waste, and material flows within the circular economy. This information is vital for tracking and optimizing resource use, waste generation, and recycling processes. Metrology establishes traceability chains that enable the tracking and documentation of materials, components, and products throughout their life cycles. This traceability facilitates compliance with regulatory requirements, ensures product authenticity, and supports the verification of recycled content and environmental claims. Calibration ensures that measuring instruments are accurate and reliable and that their measurements are traceable to recognized standards. Standardization involves the development and adoption of common measurement protocols and reference materials for specific circular economy parameters, promoting comparability. Calibration is a critical aspect of metrological traceability in the circular economy. It involves comparing the measurements obtained from a specific instrument or measurement system to a reference standard with a known level of accuracy. By calibrating measurement instruments regularly, accuracy and reliability can be ensured, thus establishing a traceable measurement chain. Standardization complements calibration by developing common measurement protocols and reference materials for specific circular economy parameters. Standardization efforts can help align measurement practices, facilitate data comparability, and promote harmonization across industries and sectors (Poposki et al. 2007; Kumar and Albashrawi 2022).
Accreditation and Certification
Metrology establishes standardized measurement procedures and quality control methods, ensuring consistent and reliable assessment of products and materials. This helps to guarantee the quality, performance, and durability of products throughout their life cycles, promoting reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling. Accreditation bodies can provide recognition to laboratories and organizations that demonstrate competence and adherence to traceability requirements. Certification schemes can be established to verify the compliance of products, processes, and services with traceability standards in the circular economy. Accreditation plays a significant role in metrological traceability by providing formal recognition of the competence and compliance of laboratories and organizations. Accredited laboratories are assessed against international standards and demonstrate their ability to produce accurate and reliable measurement results. By seeking accreditation, laboratories contribute to establishing trust in their measurement capabilities, ensuring traceability, and maintaining high-quality standards. Certification schemes can also be developed to verify that products, processes, or services meet specific traceability requirements in the circular economy. Certification assures stakeholders and consumers that the products and services they engage with adhere to traceability standards. Metrology enables process optimization by providing accurate data on material properties, dimensions, and performance characteristics. This information helps to identify areas for improvement, minimize material waste, reduce energy consumption, and enhance overall process efficiency in the circular economy. Stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, and industry practitioners, should collaborate to establish best practices for metrological traceability in the circular economy (Bhatnagar et al. 2022; Yadav et al. 2023; Rab et al. 2021).
Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing
Sharing knowledge and experiences can help drive innovation, improve measurement techniques, and address challenges associated with traceability implementation. Successful implementation of metrological traceability in the circular economy requires collaboration and knowledge sharing among stakeholders. Researchers, policymakers, industry practitioners, and metrology experts need to collaborate to develop best practices, share experiences, and address challenges associated with traceability. Collaborative efforts can involve the development of guidelines, training programs, and workshops to educate stakeholders about traceability requirements and promote its adoption. International collaboration is particularly important to ensure consistency and comparability across borders and sectors, facilitating the global transition to a circular economy.
Challenges and Future Perspectives
Implementing metrological traceability in the circular economy comes with challenges, including the availability of accurate reference materials, the complexity of measuring certain circular economy parameters, and advancements in measurement technologies that play a crucial role in enhancing metrological traceability in the circular economy. Implementing metrological traceability in the circular economy comes with challenges, including the availability of accurate reference materials, the complexity of measuring certain circular economy parameters, and the need for international coordination. Overcoming these challenges requires ongoing research, technological advancements, and collaboration among stakeholders.
Advancement of Technologies
Emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), sensor networks, and data analytics enable real-time monitoring and measurement of circular economy parameters. These technologies can provide accurate and timely data on resource consumption, waste generation, and recycling rates, enhancing the traceability of circular economy practices. Additionally, advancements in analytical techniques, such as isotopic analysis and spectroscopy, contribute to the accurate quantification of environmental impact and the identification of material composition, further supporting traceability efforts.
Data Management and Digitalization
Effective data management and digitalization are essential for metrological traceability in the circular economy. Robust data management systems ensure the integrity, security, and accessibility of measurement data throughout the traceability chain. Digital platforms and databases can facilitate the exchange of measurement data, harmonization of measurement practices, and provide transparency to stakeholders. Leveraging technologies such as blockchain can enhance data integrity and trust by creating an immutable record of measurements and transactions in the circular economy.
Consumer Confidence, Trust, and Economic Benefits
Metrology contributes to building consumer confidence and trust in the circular economy. It ensures that recycled and remanufactured products meet the same performance and safety standards as their virgin counterparts. This fosters acceptance and adoption of circular products by consumers. Such efforts lead to economic benefits in the circular economy. By optimizing processes, minimizing waste, and improving product quality, metrology helps reduce production costs, resource consumption, fair transactions, market transparency, and the development of new business models based on circular principles.
Research
Metrological traceability in the circular economy is an evolving field that helps in continuous innovations, improvement, research, development of new materials, assessment of their properties, and evaluation of their environmental impact. Metrology also enables the testing and validation of emerging technologies, such as additive manufacturing and advanced recycling processes. As new challenges and complexities arise, ongoing research is needed to develop innovative measurement techniques, establish traceability frameworks for emerging circular economy practices, and address gaps in current traceability standards. Collaborative research efforts can contribute to advancing metrology capabilities, improving measurement accuracy, and ensuring traceability in the circular economy.
Challenges and Role of Metrology and Standardization
The circular economy presents several challenges, and metrology and standardization can play a crucial role in addressing them. Here are some of the challenges in the circular economy and how metrology and standardization can help:
Lack of Consistency and Comparability
One of the challenges in the circular economy is the lack of consistency and comparability in measurements and data. Different organizations may use different methodologies and metrics to assess resource efficiency, environmental impact, and recycling rates, making it difficult to compare and benchmark performance. This is where standardization comes to the aid of organizations. Standards pave the way in which organizations can have consistent and comparable measurements and data. Metrology and standardization establish common measurement protocols, reference materials, and calibration procedures, ensuring consistent and comparable measurements across different entities. This enables effective benchmarking, performance monitoring, and data-driven decision-making in the circular economy.
Traceability and Transparency
Ensuring traceability and transparency is another challenge in the circular economy. It is important to track the flow of materials, products, and waste throughout the value chain to ensure accountability and promote responsible practices. Metrology provides the foundation for traceability by establishing a documented chain of measurements, starting from recognized standards. Standardization complements traceability by establishing guidelines and requirements for recording and reporting relevant data. Together, metrology and standardization enable traceability and transparency, helping stakeholders understand the origins, composition, and fate of materials and products in the circular economy.
Measurement Complexity
Measuring circular economy parameters can be complex due to the diverse range of materials, products, and processes involved. For example, assessing the environmental impact of a product throughout its life cycle requires considering multiple factors such as raw material extraction, manufacturing, use phase, and end-of-life treatment. Metrology provides the expertise and methodologies to develop appropriate measurement techniques and indicators that capture the complexities of circular economy systems. By leveraging metrology expertise, accurate and reliable measurements can be obtained, supporting informed decision-making and the development of effective circular economy strategies.
Innovation and Technology Integration
The circular economy relies on innovative technologies and processes that maximize resource efficiency and minimize waste generation. However, integrating these technologies into existing measurement practices and ensuring their compatibility can be challenging. Metrology and standardization play a crucial role in facilitating the integration of innovative technologies by developing measurement standards, protocols, and guidelines specific to circular economy practices. This helps ensure that measurements align with the principles and objectives of the circular economy, enabling the effective assessment of performance and progress.
International Collaboration
The circular economy is a global concept that requires international collaboration to address common challenges and achieve shared goals. Harmonizing measurement practices and standards across borders and sectors are essential for enabling consistent reporting and comparability of circular economy performance. Metrology and standardization foster international collaboration by providing a common language and framework for measurement, enabling effective communication and knowledge sharing among stakeholders globally. International cooperation in metrology and standardization facilitates the exchange of best practices, the development of harmonized measurement techniques, and the establishment of global traceability systems in the circular economy.
Status of the Circular Economy in India and Some Global Trends
Circular Economy in India
Policy and Initiatives
The Indian government has taken steps to promote the circular economy. As a result, India has made significant strides in promoting the circular economy through various policies and initiatives (Patwa et al. 2021; Liu and Ramakrishna 2021; Sohal et al. 2022). The government launched the National Mission on Sustainable Habitat to promote sustainable urban development, including the adoption of circular economy principles. Additionally, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has implemented programs like the National Resource Efficiency Policy (NREP) in 2019, which aims to mainstream resource efficiency and circularity across various sectors, the Solid Waste Management Rules and Plastic Waste Management Rules, to address waste management and promote recycling (Modak 2021).
Waste Management
India faces significant challenges in waste management, and the circular economy provides an opportunity to address these issues. However, the country has also witnessed the emergence of innovative solutions. For example, initiatives like the Swachh Bharat Mission have focused on improving waste collection and segregation practices. Various startups and social enterprises are also working on innovative recycling and waste management models to reduce waste and promote resource recovery. Initiatives such as waste segregation, recycling, and waste-to-energy projects have been implemented in cities like Bengaluru and Pune. With the rapid growth in electronic consumption, e-waste management has become crucial. India has seen the establishment of e-waste management regulations and the emergence of recycling and refurbishing facilities to handle electronic waste responsibly (Priyadarshini and Abhilash 2020; Fiksel et al. 2021).
Renewable Energy Transition
India is actively transitioning toward renewable energy sources, which aligns with the circular economy principles of reducing reliance on finite resources and promoting the use of renewable energy. The government has set ambitious targets for renewable energy deployment, including 450 GW by 2030, which includes solar, wind, and other forms of clean energy. India has been making significant strides in renewable energy adoption, particularly in solar and wind power. Transitioning to renewable energy sources aligns with the circular economy’s principles by reducing reliance on fossil fuels and promoting a sustainable energy system (Nudurupati et al. 2022; Lal et al. 2022).
Water Management
Given water scarcity issues in certain regions of India, there has been a growing emphasis on water conservation and management. Circular water management approaches, such as rainwater harvesting, wastewater treatment, and reuse, are being adopted to ensure the efficient use of this vital resource (Krishna et al. 2020; Varma 2022; Nainwal 2021).
Other Initiatives
The sharing economy, which allows people to access goods and services on demand rather than owning them outright, has been gaining popularity in India. Platforms facilitating ride-sharing, home-sharing, and coworking spaces have emerged, promoting the efficient use of resources. The fashion industry has been a significant contributor to environmental degradation. In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on sustainable fashion in India, with the rise of eco-friendly clothing brands, upcycling initiatives, and awareness campaigns promoting responsible fashion choices (Ahsan 2020; Ganapati and Reddick 2018; Sinha et al. 2022).
Global Trends in Circular Economy
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Many countries have implemented or strengthened EPR regulations, which hold manufacturers responsible for the entire life cycle of their products. EPR encourages producers to design products for durability, repairability, and recyclability and promotes recycling and responsible waste management.
Circular Design and Innovations
Designing products for circularity is gaining momentum globally. Companies are focusing on eco-design principles, such as using recyclable materials, reducing waste generation, and incorporating renewable energy sources. Innovative business models, such as product-as-a-service and sharing economy platforms, are also emerging to promote resource efficiency and reduce consumption.
Collaboration and Partnerships
Collaboration between various stakeholders, including businesses, governments, NGOs, and academia, is crucial for driving the circular economy. Public-private partnerships are being formed to create circular supply chains, share knowledge and best practices, and accelerate the transition to a circular economy.
Digitalization and Technology
Digital technologies, such as blockchain, the Internet of Things (IoT), and artificial intelligence (AI), are playing an increasingly important role in enabling the circular economy. These technologies facilitate traceability, transparency, and efficient resource management throughout the value chain.
Sustainable Finance and Investments
There is a growing interest from investors and financial institutions in supporting circular economy initiatives. Sustainable finance and impact investment are directing capital toward businesses that prioritize circularity, resource efficiency, and sustainability.
Digital Transformation in Circular Economy
Digital transformation plays a significant role in addressing the challenges of the circular economy by enabling innovative solutions, enhancing resource efficiency, and improving collaboration and transparency. It offers numerous opportunities to address challenges in the circular economy, like leveraging digital technologies, companies and stakeholders can optimize supply chains, improve product design and life cycle management, enable circular business models, make data-driven decisions, engage consumers, and foster collaboration and knowledge sharing. However, it is important to consider the digital divide and ensure inclusive access to digital tools and skills, to avoid exacerbating inequalities in the adoption and benefits of the circular economy. Here are some ways in which digital transformation can help face challenges in the circular economy:
Supply Chain Optimization
Digital technologies, such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, blockchain, and data analytics, enable real-time monitoring and optimization of supply chains. This allows for better tracking of materials and products, ensuring transparency, traceability, and accountability. Digital tools can help identify inefficiencies, optimize logistics, and reduce waste in the supply chain, thereby enhancing resource efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.
Product Life Cycle Management
Digital transformation facilitates effective product life cycle management, enabling companies to design products for durability, reparability, and recyclability. Product data can be stored and analyzed digitally, allowing for better decision-making in terms of material selection, design improvements, and end-of-life considerations. Digital tools can also support the implementation of take-back programs, enabling effective collection, disassembly, and recycling of products and components.
Circular Business Models
Digital platforms and sharing economy models have emerged as enablers of circular business models. Through digital platforms, companies can facilitate the exchange, sharing, and reuse of products, components, and resources. These platforms connect sellers and buyers, encourage collaborative consumption, and extend the life span of products, reducing the need for new production. Digital marketplaces and peer-to-peer platforms also promote the circular economy by enabling secondhand sales, repair services, and material exchanges.
Data-Driven Decision-Making
Digital transformation provides access to vast amounts of data, which can be analyzed to derive valuable insights for decision-making in the circular economy. Data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be employed to assess environmental impact, resource consumption, and waste generation. This data-driven approach helps identify opportunities for improvement, optimize resource allocation, and measure the effectiveness of circular economy initiatives.
Consumer Engagement and Education
Digital technologies enhance consumer communication and engagement, raising awareness about the circular economy and influencing sustainable behavior. Social media, online platforms, and mobile applications can be utilized to educate consumers about sustainable consumption practices, promote responsible product disposal, and facilitate the exchange of information between consumers and companies. Digital tools can also enable product labeling and certification schemes, allowing consumers to make informed choices and support circular products and services.
Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing
Some digital platforms and tools facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing among various stakeholders in the circular economy. Online communities, forums, and collaboration platforms enable the exchange of best practices, case studies, and research findings. These platforms foster collaboration between businesses, governments, research institutions, and civil society organizations, accelerating the transition to a circular economy through joint initiatives, research projects, and policy development.
Important Standards Applicable in Circular Economy
As such, there is no definitive list of standards specific to the circular economy, and several existing standards and frameworks are relevant and widely used. Some of the key standards and frameworks applicable to the circular economy are listed in Table 1.
Conclusion and Way Forward
The chapter highlighted the transition from linear to circular systems and offered an outline of the circular economy concept and its historical foundations. It emphasized the requirement to reduce waste and increase resource efficiency. The chapter also examined the fundamental components of conformity assessment in the circular economy, such as product design and material selection, manufacturing procedures, product use and maintenance, recycling, and waste management. Standardization, quality, consumer confidence, market access, and environmental protection are just a few of the advantages of conformity assessment. Additionally, the chapter demonstrates the value of metrological traceability in the circular economy, which ensures precise and trustworthy measures of environmental effect, resource consumption, and recycling rates. It highlighted the function of conformity assessment in fostering traceability and transparency, assessing supply chain management programs, and validating environmental claims.
Looking ahead, the integration of metrology and conformity assessment in the circular economy holds significant potential for further advancements and positive impacts. Here are some futuristic prospects that can enhance the role of metrology and conformity assessment in achieving sustainable growth within the circular economy:
Technological Advancements
Rapid advancements in technology, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and blockchain, offer exciting prospects for enhancing metrology and conformity assessment in the circular economy. IoT-enabled sensors can provide real-time data on resource consumption, waste generation, and product life cycles, enabling more accurate and efficient measurement. AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data, identifying patterns and optimizing circular economy processes. Blockchain technology can enhance transparency and traceability, ensuring the credibility and integrity of conformity assessment systems.
Life Cycle Assessment Integration
The integration of metrology and conformity assessment with life cycle assessment methodologies can provide a comprehensive and holistic approach to measuring sustainability in the circular economy. By combining quantitative measurement data with qualitative environmental and social impact assessments, stakeholders can gain a deeper understanding of the entire product life cycle. This integration will enable more informed decision-making and facilitate the design of truly sustainable products and services.
Circular Design and Eco-Labeling
Metrology and conformity assessment can support circular design principles by verifying the recyclability, reparability, and durability of products. In the future, there is a potential for the development of eco-labeling schemes that provide consumers with clear information about a product’s circularity and environmental performance. Standardized metrics and conformity assessment processes will play a crucial role in establishing credible eco-labeling schemes, enabling consumers to make sustainable choices, and incentivizing businesses to adopt circular economy practices.
Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing
The global nature of sustainability challenges calls for increased collaboration and knowledge sharing among countries, metrology institutes, conformity assessment bodies, and industry stakeholders. International cooperation can facilitate the exchange of best practices, harmonization of measurement techniques, and the development of common standards and methodologies. Sharing knowledge and experiences will foster innovation, enhance the effectiveness of conformity assessment processes, and drive the adoption of circular economy practices on a global scale.
Consumer Empowerment and Awareness
As consumers become increasingly conscious of the environmental and social impacts of their choices, there is a growing demand for transparent and trustworthy information. Metrology and conformity assessment can empower consumers by providing accurate and reliable data on the circularity and sustainability of products. Future prospects include the development of user-friendly tools and mobile applications that allow consumers to access and compare product information, eco-labels, and life cycle data. This empowerment will drive market demand for sustainable products and encourage businesses to adopt circular economy practices.
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
Governments and regulatory bodies play a pivotal role in shaping the transition to a circular economy. In the future, there is a need for comprehensive policy frameworks that support the integration of metrology and conformity assessment in circular economy practices. Governments can establish incentives for businesses to adopt standardized metrics, conformity assessment processes, and eco-labeling schemes. Furthermore, regulations can be developed to ensure the accuracy and credibility of environmental claims, preventing greenwashing and promoting sustainable growth.
By embracing these prospects, the role of metrology and conformity assessment in the circular economy can evolve and expand, contributing to a more sustainable and resilient future. With technological advancements, integration with life cycle assessment, eco-labeling schemes, global collaboration, consumer empowerment, and supportive policy frameworks, metrology and conformity assessment will continue to play a vital role in driving sustainable growth within the circular economy.
References
Ahsan M (2020) Entrepreneurship and ethics in the sharing economy: A critical perspective. J Bus Ethics 161(1):19–33
ASTM (2016) E3012-16—Standard guide for characterizing environmental aspects of manufacturing processes
Atiemo S, Faabeluon L, Manhart A, Nyaaba L, Schleicher T (2016, June) Baseline assessment on E-waste management in Ghana. In: Swiss Institute for Materials Science & Technology (Empa), World Resources Forum (WRF). Ghana National Cleaner Production Centre, and Oeko-Institut, Accra
Awasthi AK, Wang M, Wang Z, Awasthi MK, Li J (2018) E-waste management in India: a mini-review. Waste Manag Res 36(5):408–414
Baez R, Orozco R (2008) Use of ISO 10012 in the ISOIEC 17025 integration model in an ISO 9001 system. In: Metrology symposium
Beges G, Drnovsek J, Pendrill LR (2010) Optimising calibration and measurement capabilities in terms of economics in conformity assessment. Accred Qual Assur 15:147–154
Bhatnagar A, Rab S, Wan M, Yadav S (2022) Quality measurements and relevant Indian infrastructure. In: Handbook of metrology and applications. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 1–18
Bjørn A, Hauschild MZ (2018) Cradle to cradle and LCA. In: Life cycle assessment: theory and practice, pp 605–631
Bocken NM, De Pauw I, Bakker C, Van Der Grinten B (2016) Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J Ind Prod Eng 33(5):308–320
Bourguignon D (2016) Closing the loop: new circular economy package
Braungart M, McDonough W (2009) Cradle to cradle. Random House
Briggs SL (2022) Standards and sustainability. Qual Prog 55(1):18–18
BSI P (2016) Carbon management in infrastructure. PAS 2080: 2016 31(05):60
Coalition, S. A. (2021). Sustainable apparel coalition
Corvellec H, Stowell AF, Johansson N (2022) Critiques of the circular economy. J Ind Ecol 26(2):421–432
Council A. Corporate Services Committee–28 January 2010 carbon trust standard accreditation report by the director of corporate services
Council, U. G. B (2005) LEED: leadership in energy and environmental design. US Green Building Council, Washington, DC. Website Accessed 6 Apr 2005
Council RJ, Floor F, House D (2009) The responsible Jewellery Council
Delaney H (ed) (2008) Guide to EU standards and conformity assessment. DIANE Publishing
Diaz LF (2017) Waste management in developing countries and the circular economy. Waste Manag Res 35(1):1–2
Din E (2012) ISO/IEC 17065: conformity assessment-requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services (ISO/IEC 17065: 2012). German and English version EN ISO/IEC, 17065
Elisha OD (2020) Moving beyond take-make-dispose to take-make-use for sustainable economy. Int J Sci Res Educ 13(3):497–516
Fiksel J, Sanjay P, Raman K (2021) Steps toward a resilient circular economy in India. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23:203–218
Ganapati S, Reddick CG (2018) Prospects and challenges of sharing economy for the public sector. Gov Inf Q 35(1):77–87
García R, Freire F (2014) Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG protocol, PAS 2050 and climate declaration. J Clean Prod 66:199–209
Geng Y, Sarkis J, Bleischwitz R (2019) How to globalize the circular economy. Nature 565(7738):153–155
Goodship V, Stevels A, Huisman J (eds) (2019) Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) handbook. Woodhead Publishing
Goyal S, Esposito M, Kapoor A (2018) Circular economy business models in developing economies: lessons from India on reduce, recycle, and reuse paradigms. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 60(5):729–740
Henson A (2021) Metrological traceability: a global perspective. In: New Frontiers for metrology: from biology and chemistry to quantum and data science. IOS Press, pp 215–230
Iraldo F, Barberio M (2017) Drivers, barriers and benefits of the EU ecolabel in European companies’ perception. Sustainability 9(5):751
ISO and IEC (International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission) (2012) ISO/IEC 17020: conformity assessment—requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection
ISO E (2010) IEC 17043: 2010 conformity assessment–general requirements for proficiency testing. Bedömning av överensstämmelse—Allmänna krav för kompetensprövning (av laboratorium)
Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Suman R, Hussain B, Rab S (2022) Extensive capabilities of additive manufacturing and its metrological aspects. Mapan 37(4):707–720
Jonker, J., Stegeman, H., & Faber, N. (2017). The circular economy-developments, concepts, and research in the search for corresponding business models
Jovanović B, Filipović J (2016) ISO 50001 standard-based energy management maturity model–proposal and validation in industry. J Clean Prod 112:2744–2755
Kankar PK, Moona G, Desai KA (2022) Measurement and metrology in advanced manufacturing processes. Mapan 37(4):703–705
Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:221–232
Klöpffer W (2012) The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044: origin, purpose and practical performance. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1087–1093
Korhonen J, Nuur C, Feldmann A, Birkie SE (2018) Circular economy is an essentially contested concept. J Clean Prod 175:544–552
Krishna RS, Mishra J, Ighalo JO (2020) Rising demand for rain water harvesting system in the world: a case study of Joda Town, India. World Scientific News 146:47–59
Kristoffersen E, Blomsma F, Mikalef P, Li J (2020) The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. J Bus Res 120:241–261
Kumar V, Albashrawi S (2022) Quality infrastructure of Saudi Arabia and its importance for vision 2030. Mapan 37(1):97–106
Lal SRS, Herbert GMJ, Arjunan P, Suryan A (2022) Advancements in renewable energy transition in India: a review. In: Energy sources, part A: recovery, utilization, and environmental effects, pp 1–31
Liepiņa R, Lapiņa I, Mazais J (2014) Contemporary issues of quality management: relationship between conformity assessment and quality management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 110:627–637
Liu L, Ramakrishna S (eds) (2021) An introduction to circular economy. Springer Singapore, Singapore
MacArthur E (2013) Towards the circular economy. J Ind Ecol 2(1):23–44
Malhotra A, Mathur A, Diddi S, Sagar AD (2022) Building institutional capacity for addressing climate and sustainable development goals: achieving energy efficiency in India. Clim Pol 22(5):652–670
Marimon F, Casadesús M (2017) Reasons to adopt ISO 50001 energy management system. Sustainability 9(10):1740
Marx A, Cuypers D (2010) Forest certification as a global environmental governance tool: what is the macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council? Regul Gov 4(4):408–434
Meškuotienė A, Dobilienė J, Raudienė E, Gaidamovičiūtė L (2022) A review of metrological supervision: towards the common understanding of metrological traceability in legal and industrial metrology. Mapan 37(3):693–701
Mestre A, Cooper T (2017) Circular product design. A multiple loops life cycle design approach for the circular economy. Des J 20(sup1):S1620–S1635
Migliore M, Talamo C, Paganin G, Migliore M, Talamo C, Paganin G (2020) Circular economy and sustainable procurement: the role of the attestation of conformity. In: Strategies for circular economy and cross-sectoral exchanges for sustainable building products: preventing and recycling waste, pp 159–173
Modak P (2021) Circular economy practices in India. In: An introduction to circular economy, pp 555–575
Morrow D, Rondinelli D (2002) Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. Eur Manag J 20(2):159–171
Nainwal A (2021) Water resource management for sustainable urban development. Math Statistician Eng Appl 70(1):706–712
Natarajan D (2017) ISO 9001 quality management systems. Springer International Publishing
Nelles M, Gruenes J, Morscheck G (2016) Waste management in Germany–development to a sustainable circular economy? Procedia Environ Sci 35:6–14
Nudurupati SS, Budhwar P, Pappu RP, Chowdhury S, Kondala M, Chakraborty A, Ghosh SK (2022) Transforming sustainability of Indian small and medium-sized enterprises through circular economy adoption. J Bus Res 149:250–269
Patwa N, Sivarajah U, Seetharaman A, Sarkar S, Maiti K, Hingorani K (2021) Towards a circular economy: an emerging economies context. J Bus Res 122:725–735
Pauli GA (2010) The blue economy: 10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs. Paradigm Publications
Pendrill LR (2005) Meeting future needs for metrological traceability—a physicist’s view. Accred Qual Assur 10:133–139
Poposki N, Todorova A, Majcen N, Taylor P (2007) Assessment of national priorities for metrology and conformity assessment
Priyadarshini P, Abhilash PC (2020) Circular economy practices within energy and waste management sectors of India: a meta-analysis. Bioresour Technol 304:123018
Rab S, Brown RJ (2023) The UKQI: status and importance for National Growth. Mapan 38:1–10
Rab S, Yadav S (2022) Concept of unbroken chain of traceability. Resonance 27(5):835–838
Rab S, Yadav S, Garg N, Rajput S, Aswal DK (2020) Evolution of measurement system and SI units in India. Mapan 35:475–490
Rab S, Yadav S, Jaiswal SK, Haleem A, Aswal DK (2021) Quality infrastructure of national metrology institutes: a comparative study. Indian J Pure Appl Phys (IJPAP) 59(4):285–303
Rab S, Wan M, Sharma RK, Kumar L, Zafer A, Saeed K, Yadav S (2023) Digital avatar of metrology. Mapan 38:1–8
Ramakrishna S, Jose R (2022) Principles of materials circular economy. Matter 5(12):4097–4099
Rathoure AK, Patel U (2019) 10 management of solid and hazardous waste as per Indian legislation. In: Zero waste: management practices for environmental sustainability
Read S (2017) ISO/IEC 17025: 2017-General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
Ringsberg HA (2015) Implementation of global traceability standards: incentives and opportunities. Br Food J 117(7):1826–1842
Rossi E, Bertassini AC, dos Santos Ferreira C, do Amaral WAN, Ometto AR (2020) Circular economy indicators for organizations considering sustainability and business models: plastic, textile and electro-electronic cases. J Clean Prod 247:119137
Sinha P, Sharma M, Agrawal R (2022) A systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable fashion in the apparel industry. BIJ. (ahead-of-print)
Sohal A, Nand AA, Goyal P, Bhattacharya A (2022) Developing a circular economy: an examination of SME’s role in India. J Bus Res 142:435–447
Stahel WR (2016) The circular economy. Nature 531(7595):435–438
Standard B (2006) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. EN ISO/IEC 17025:42
Sugianto S, Soediantono D (2022) Literature review of ISO 26000 corporate social responsibility (CSR) and implementation recommendations to the defense industries. J Ind Eng Manag Res 3(2):73–87
Van den Berg MR, Bakker CA (2015) A product design framework for a circular economy. In: Product lifetimes and the environment, pp 365–379
Varma VG (2022) Water-efficient technologies for sustainable development. In: Current directions in water scarcity research, vol 6. Elsevier, pp 101–128
Vogl J (2021) Metrology for the recycling of technology critical elements to support Europe’s circular economy agenda (MetrocycleEU)
Wastling T, Charnley F, Moreno M (2018) Design for circular behaviour: considering users in a circular economy. Sustainability 10(6):1743
Woods M (2003) The global reporting initiative. CPA J 73(6):60
Yadav S, Rab S, Jaiswal SK, Kumar A, Aswal DK (2023) Industrial metrology: introduction. In: Handbook of metrology and applications. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, pp 1–21
Yin H, Schmeidler PJ (2009) Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Bus Strateg Environ 18(7):469–486
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Crown
About this entry
Cite this entry
Yadav, S., Rab, S., Wan, M., Bhatnagar, A., Jain, A., Achanta, V.G. (2024). Role of Conformity Assessment and Metrology in the Circular Economy for Sustainable Growth. In: Bhatnagar, A., Yadav, S., Achanta, V., Harmes-Liedtke, U., Rab, S. (eds) Handbook of Quality System, Accreditation and Conformity Assessment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4637-2_19-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4637-2_19-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4637-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4637-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering